Thursday, July 23, 2015

Bird photos comparing images of pocket camera to DSLR

Planning to travel light on my rail excursion in the Canadian Rockies, I considered whether or not to pack my DSLR camera, a Canon 60D with 300 mm L/4.0 IS USM and 1.4x extender (420 mm  f/5.6 lens system). I favor bird photography and especially small birds. A long lens is indispensable for this purpose, so I researched the possibility of simply bringing a pocket camera with a long reach. 

I did not expect this trip to provide many opportunities to lurk and wait for the little ones to come into view, and did not expect a high level of performance from such a small backup camera. Settling on the Canon SX700 HS was not easy, as the reviews suggested several very close contenders with an optical zoom of 30X. I chose Canon partly out of faith in the Canon ecosystem. I own two earlier PowerShots, an  A40 (only 2.0 megapixels!) and an A-1100 IS (12.1 megapixels), and both performed very well.

The new PowerShot SX700 HS (16.1 megapixels), captured this image of a Black-billed Magpie on the grounds of the Fairmont Chateau Hotel in Lake Louise, Alberta, on June 18, 2015:

Black-billed Magpie 20150618

My next post will include more photos and videos taken on the Rocky Mountaineer Railway trip from Vancouver, British Columbia to Calgary, Alberta.

Just to demonstrate that the number of pixels is relatively unimportant, here is an example of a digiscopic photo of a Western Bluebird that I took in New Mexico back in 2003 with my first 2.0 megapixel Powershot through the lens of a Kowa Prominar TSN-24 spotting scope zoomed to about 30x:


Western Bluebird female FEB03

Certainly the image (576 x 423 pixels) is very soft, yet is is one of my favorite bird pictures. This leads me to ask myself why I need more megapixels. I'm not out to sell any of my photos, although I am honored when one is used for educational purposes under my FLICKR Creative Commons license (especially if I first receive the courtesy of a request!). No, what I value most is the feeling of the time and place where I captured an image. National Geographic is certainly above my pay grade!


The optical lens of the PowerShot SX700 HS zooms from  a focal length of 4.5 to 135.0 mm, which is said to be up to the equivalent of 450 mm in a 35 mm camera. Digital zoom can be added when fully zoomed optically, from 0 to 4x, producing magnification up to to 1200x. 


My first few attempts at photographing creatures in the wild produced some nice results. See this post for some examples: http://rosy-finch.blogspot.com/2014/12/bird-photography-with-pocket-camera.html


To more objectively test my new Powershot I purchased a hot shoe mount with a simple ball head (Smallrig LCD Monitor Adapter 1/4" Camera Hot Shoe Mount,  $9.50 at Amazon.com). The Powershot can be mounted directly over the DSLR to allow both cameras to take photos of the same scene nearly simultaneously.


Canon SX 700 HS with tripod extender 20141207


Double camera rig 20141207


I took a series of test photos comparing the two cameras. The DSLR was fitted with the 420 mm lens system and the Powershot was at full optical 30X zoom. Unless otherwise noted, the photos are compared full frame and straight out of the cameras (SOOC), with the exception of the DSLR images, which I cropped on one or both sides to reduce them to the same 4:3 format as the pocket camera. This permits a fair comparison of the relative size of the images. 


Similarly, the images from both cameras were processed with Canon DPP using the HD (single layer) application to sharpen and enhance color automatically. The DSLR was set to Av f/5.6 and the Powershot to AUTO for all photos.

My first attempt, using the dual mounts on a monopod, was to photograph this Great Blue Heron roosting on a power pole about 120 feet away with the low morning sun coming in from the right side of the frame.  The two photos were taken less than 30 seconds apart. This is the DSLR image, straight out of the camera (SOOC), with 420 mm focal length, Aperture Priority. shutter Speed (Tv) 1/640; Aperture Value (Av) f/5.6; ISO 200:


Great Blue Heron SOOC Canon 60D 20141211


The PowerShot image is fairly comparable in size. It was optically zoomed to 105.0 mm.  Shutter speed (Tv) 1/250; Aperture Value (Av) f/6.3; ISO 100 (Auto): 


Great Blue Heron SOOC Powershot SX700 20141211

Here are crops of the above two photos, not otherwise processed. This is from the

Canon 60D DSLR:

Great Blue Heron CROP Canon 60D 20141211


Canon PowerShot SX700 HS:


Great Blue Heron CROP Powershot SX700 20141211


In my next comparison the subject was an Osprey on an extinct utility pole about 350-400 feet away, again using the hot shoe tripod extender mounted atop the DSLR. The photos are taken within seconds of each other from the same range. The pocket camera is set on AUTO while the DSLR is shooting Aperture Priority at f/5.6.  EXIF data for pocket camera: Tv 1/160, Av 6.9, ISO 125 (auto). EXIF for DSLR:  Tv 1/800, Av 5.6, ISO 200. 



Canon 60D DSLR:

Osprey Canon 60D 420 mm SOOC trim 20141216

Canon PowerShot SX700 HS at 30X zoom:

Osprey Canon SX700 HS SOOC 20141216

Cropped to produce images of comparable size, the eyes of the Osprey are reproduced more distinctly by the Canon 60D DSLR:


Osprey Canon 60D 420 mm SOOC crop 20141216

Canon PowerShot SX700 HS:

Osprey Canon SX700 HS SOOC crop 20141216

Small birds are not easy to capture without a viewfinder. The LCD screen of the PowerShot is bright enough in daylight, but if the sun is directly to the rear it washes it out badly. This bird was moving about and was hard to track, so the images are not entirely comparable, but both were taken from the same distance of 25 feet (7.5 meters).


Palm Warbler SOOC, trimmed at sides but not processed, taken by the Canon 60D DSLR:


Palm Warbler Canon 60D 20141218


Canon PowerShot SX700 HS, SOOC, unprocessed:


Palm Warbler Canon Powershot 30X  20141218


Below is a set of cropped and similarly processed images of the same bird within seconds of each other (processed in Canon DPP with HD tool but no other color adjustments) comparing the two cameras.


Canon 60D DSLR:

Palm Warbler Canon 60D DPP 20141218


Canon PowerShot SX700 HS:


Palm Warbler Canon Powershot 30X  DPP 20141218


To get around the problem of the PowerShot's LCD image being washed out in sunlight, I rigged this contraption with the Hoodman Loupe which I normally use in the field to review my DSLR photos. The rubber bands are the standard accessory for attaching it to the larger camera for videography, but they fit the PowerShot perfectly without interfering with any of the control buttons.  


Hoodman Loupe on Canon SX700HS 20150303

Hoodman Loupe on Canon SX700HS 2-20150303

Reviewers downgrade the Canon SX700's low light performance. I put it to the test at only 10 minutes after sunrise, with both the Powershot (at 30X zoom) and my Canon 60D with the 420 mm lens, on a monopod with the above dual mount. The subject was about 160 feet (50 meters) away. The unprocessed shots follow:

This is the DSLR image as captured straight out of the camera, cropped to size but not otherwise processed, Aperture Priority setting  (Tv 1/200 sec, Av f/5.6, ISO 3200):


Great Blue Heron SOOC 60D 20141229


This is the corresponding Powershot image, AUTO setting, SOOC (Tv 1/30 sec, Av f/6.9, ISO 800). The image is remarkably steady, given the long exposure :


Great Blue Heron SOOC Powershot 20141229



After processing the images identically, using Canon DPP presets, here are the finished results:

Canon 60D:


Great Blue Heron DPP 60D 20141229


Canon PowerShot:


Great Blue Heron DPP Powershot 20141229



Here are comparable images of a Common Ground Dove, perched about 15 feet high, about 100 feet away. This is the PowerShot image, not zoomed. The dove is barely visible just below the center of this photo:

Ground Dove at 100 feet 20141228


The DSLR image at 100 feet:


Ground Dove at 100 feet SOOC 60D 20141228


The corresponding optically zoomed PowerShot image (Tv 1/320 sec, Av f/6.9, ISO 100):


Ground Dove at 100 feet SOOC Powershot 20141228


Moving closer, at 60 feet, here are similarly processed images. This is from the 60D DSLR (Tv 1/640 sec, Av f/5.6. ISO 100):


Ground Dove at 65 feet CROP 60D 20141228


The corresponding processed PowerShot image:


Ground Dove at 65 feet CROP Powershot 20141228


Following are some random processed images taken with the PowerShot, all set to AUTO and hand-held unless otherwise noted.


Palm Warbler at 70 feet, 30X optical zoom:


Palm Warbler 70 ft Powershot 30x optical zoom 20141221


Another shot of the same bird with 1.6X added digital zoom (48X):


 Palm Warbler 70 ft Powershot 30x optical x1.6 digital zoom 20141221


Northern Mockingbird at about 20 feet, 50% crop, zoomed optically to 30X:


Northern Mockingbird Powershot 20141221


Boat-tailed Grackle on roof, 20 feet above, digitally zoomed to 42.8 mm (about 9.5X).


Boat-tailed Grackle Canon SX 700 20141203


Turtle at range of 60 feet (18 meters) at 30X optical zoom:

Turtle CanonPS SX700 EDITED 20141129


Hand-held macro photos:


Dewdrop at about 3/4 inch (2 cm) from lens:


Dewdrop macro Canon SX 700 HS 20141216


Tiny flower calyx about 1 1/4 inch (4 cm) from lens:


Flower calyx macro Canon SX 700 HS 20141216


Spider silk with dew drops from about 8 inches (20 cm):


Web pearls HDR COREL 20141227


I have also been pleased with the quality of the landscapes produced by the PowerShot. The following were processed in Corel PaintShop ProX X7 by layering three exposures from a single JPG to create HDR images:


Clouds over lake HDR 20150415
North shore fog HDR 20150320

Sunburst HDR 20150416

This photo of the split rail fence around the community gardens in St Charles, Illinois was processed from a single image using only the HD filter of Canon Digital Photography Professional (DPP):

 Community Gardens 2-20150515
  
Having just returned from the Canada rail trip, I am still reviewing over 1200 photos I took with the PowerShot. Most were landscapes. As expected, wildlife encounters were limited. This Golden-mantled Ground Squirrel entertained visitors at the tram terminal at the top of Sulphur Mountain in Banff, Alberta:


Golden-mantled Ground Squirrel 20150620


Also from the top of the mountain, this is a monochrome rendering (three layers from a single exposure) of the view to the west:


Sulphur Mountain BW view to west 20150620


To summarize, the Canon PowerShot  SX700 HS performed quite well with smaller wildlife subjects and under marginal light conditions. Performance would probably have improved with use of a tripod, although the image stabilization is remarkably reliable. I have not yet explored other camera features, notably shooting in Aperture Priority mode which would isolate and enhance the image of smaller subjects.

= = =  = = =  = = = =  = = = = =

Linking to Misty's  CAMERA CRITTERS,


Linking to Eileen's SATURDAY'S CRITTERS,

Linking to GOOD FENCES by Tex (Theresa). 

Linking to SKYWATCH FRIDAY by Yogi, Sylvia and Sandy

Linking to WEEKEND REFLECTIONS by James

Linking to BirdD'Pot by Anni


Linking to Wild Bird Wednesday by Stewart


Linking to I Heart Macro by Laura
________________________________________________


Please visit the links to all these memes to see some excellent photos on display

________________________________________________

31 comments:

  1. Hello Ken, wonderful series of images from your trip! I enjoyed all the birds and sky shots. Have a happy day!

    ReplyDelete
  2. i think it's handling things quite well, with your rigging and processing, too. thanks, ken!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wonderful takes of all selections. Follow the birds as you did. As they find perches for Thursday

    fences as well as fences.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have really enjoyed seeing the comparison shots...I keep wanting a pocket camera...that would be less clunky to carry with me. This looks like it might be a good choice.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow there was a lot to see here today. - I think your Canon Power Shot took some fabulous photos. - I always enjoy your bird shots. Today though I really loved the Dew Drops, The Fence shots were both wonderful.

    ReplyDelete
  6. wonderful comparisons images. the powershot looks to be almost comparable to your DSLR.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I was very erested in seeing the comparisions of both cameras and certainy there was not much to choose bewteen them. I loved the macroshots especially the raindrops. thanks for sharing all this information.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Kudos for your thoughtful and systematic experimentation. While the differences appear small, but clear, in the images you've shown here, they are going to be magnified when you compare enlargements.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Kudos for trying to answer a really tough question!! I struggle all the time with "go light" vs. "go heavy". I like your comparative shots... really helpful to see the side-by-side examples.

    ReplyDelete
  10. so much of caption of life..thanks for sharing with us

    ReplyDelete
  11. Gorgeous shots! I like the photos taken by the Canon Power Shot - the colours seem to be a lot more saturated.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hi Ken, I am just stopping back to say thank you for linking up and sharing your post. Have a happy weekend!

    ReplyDelete
  13. wow- I am impressed with the little red camera! Especially the cropped version of the heron which shows the lovely ripples in the water!
    Super post!!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Wonderfully informative comparisons, Kenneth. I'm bookmarking to revisit later. I have a Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and *love* it. It continuously exceeds my expectations. I'm a complete novice when it comes to photography. Anything good is all camera, lol!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Great comparison shots and camera explanations. I am new to photography and trying to learn as much as I can about cameras. All of your photos are great. I really like the macro ones!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Very interesting post - the abilities (if thats the correct word) of the compacts are remarkable these days. But they do say, the camera you have in your hand at the time is the best one you have!

    Cheers - Stewart M - Melbourne

    ReplyDelete
  17. Ken your pics are great, and I really appreciate your camera research. I have a Canon G15 I like a lot, but it just cannot do the job on longer shots. And nothing like a DSLR with nice lenses is in the budget.

    Thank you!
    ~

    ReplyDelete
  18. I particularly like the Ground Squirrel and Turtle. Interesting camera observations ...

    ReplyDelete
  19. I really enjoyed seeing the comparisons and the wonderful selection of birds. Great photos!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Thanks for all the detail. What this really shows, however, is what a good eye you have and what an excellent photographer you are.

    ReplyDelete
  21. In my opinion there is a visible difference....the power shot [the top photos of each series of comparing] is much softer and more smooth from the subject to the background. I like the softer much better.

    Your sky images along with the birds are terrific.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Kenneth, your photos are absolutely gorgeous! Your first attempt does not look like a first attempt at all! Just beautiful!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Love those comparisons you have made.
    That split rail fence with the HD filter is just wonderful.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Your shares are all quite delightful, but I am thinking your landscapes are sweet perfection!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Great photos. I love using the Powershot.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Such an interesting comparison of shots!

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for visiting Rosyfinch Ramblings! I will enjoy a visit to your page just as soon as possible.